3. PHYSICAL MEDIA
For Local Area Networks to function they require a physical media
over which to operate, which might be seen as the first layer or
physical layer in the OSI model. In the past this would have been
10Base 5, or 10 Base 2 Coax, but the most common type of cabling
at the time of writing is UTP (Unshielded Twisted Pair). Alternate
media that are also used are fibre optic, or wireless systems which
have become more popular in recent years The following paragraphs
provide an overview various media options.
Copper Cabling
Co-axial
Co-axial cable (sometimes referred to as co-ax), is based
on a central copper core encased in a plastic sheath which is then
surrounded in a plastic coating.
The signal is carried on the central core with the outer conductor
or mesh forming a screen to outside electrical noise. The most common
example of co-axial is television aerial cable.
Originally this form of cable was the most common form of LAN cable
due to its high capacity and resistance to interference.
Its main disadvantage is its thickness, which means it is limited
in its ability to be run through small cable ducts and around tight
angles. Also, the cost of co-ax is relatively high in comparison
to more traditional forms of data cabling.
While coax, both thick and thin is rarely used, most of the networks,
which specified this cable type, are now able to operate on other
types such as unshielded twisted pair (UTP) or on fibre.
Thick Ethernet
This form of cabling, often known as Yellow Cable was
the original co-axial cable used by most networks, with Ethernet
being the main champion of such cable. Its capacity in terms of
distance is great, but the cost of cabling is high and its thickness
prohibitive in tight cable runs and cabling ducts, which may already
be relatively full.
Thin Coax
Thin coax (RG58) was introduced to reduce the cost of cabling networks.
This was mainly associated with Ethernet and became known as Cheapernet.
Its main sacrifice over Ethernet is the distance that a single branch
can run. However the cable is much cheaper and thinner, and therefore
overcomes some of the disadvantages of the original cable.
Top 
Twisted Pair
Today twisted pair cabling is the most common form of cabling.
It originated as the method for connecting telephones to the local
PABX with the same wiring used to connect data terminals to computers
around a building.
The pairs are twisted to reduce the interference between adjacent
pairs in the cable. Usually a series of pairs are encased in a single
sheath and colour coded to reduce the numbers of physical cables,
which need to be pulled through the ducting.
Twisted Pair Unscreened
The main advantage of this type of cable is that its lower cost,
easy to handle and cables already laid for other devices can often
be re-used to implement a LAN.
The main drawbacks are its relatively high error rate and the short
distances which can be run without signal regeneration.
Twisted Pair Screened
Screened twisted pair has been introduced to reduce the number
of errors due to outside interference. The wire is encased in a
metallic braid, somewhat similar to co-axial cable. This reduces
errors but also raises costs.
Categories of Twisted Pair Cable
Category 5 cable Cat 5
Commonly known as Cat 5, this is an unshielded twisted pair cable
designed for high signal integrity. The actual standard defines
specific electrical properties of the wire, but it is most commonly
known as being rated for its Ethernet capability of 100 Mbit/s.
Its specific standard designation is EIA/TIA-568. Cat 5 cable typically
has three twists per inch of each twisted pair of 24 gauge copper
wires within the cable. Another important characteristic is that
the wires are insulated with a plastic (FEP) that has low dispersion,
that is, the dielectric constant of the plastic does not depend
greatly on frequency. Special attention also has to be paid to minimizing
impedance mismatches at connection points.
It is often used in structured cabling for computer networks such
as Fast Ethernet, although it is often used to carry many other
signals such as basic voice services, token ring, and ATM (at up
to 155 Mbit/s, over short distances).
Category 5 (Cat 5) Patch Leads
Patch leads created from Cat 5 are often terminated with RJ-45
electrical connectors. Normal Cat 5 cables are wired straight
through and connect a computer to a hub or switch. In other
words, pin 1 is connected to pin 1, pin 2 to pin 2, etc. The RJ-45
pinout for a Cat 5 cable can either be TIA-568A or TIA-568B. TIA-568A
is used by some phone systems and Token Ring. Most everything else,
such as the Ethernet standards 10BASE-T and 100BASE-TX, use TIA-568B.
In Ethernet, crossover Cat 5 cables are cables in which
pairs two and three are reversed. (For 100BASE-T4 a more complex
connection layout is needed.) These are most often used to connect
two PCs NICs directly (with no intervening hub). They can
also be used to connect two hubs or switches together. However most
hubs and switches either have an uplink port, a button to change
a port to uplink or one or more ports with autosense (most modern
switches now have autosense on every port). These features eliminate
the need for crossover cables when connecting them.
Category 5e Cable (CAT5e)
Cat 5e cable is an enhanced version of Cat 5 for use with 1000
Base-T networks, or for long-distance 100 Base-T links (350 m, compared
with 100 m for Cat 5). It must meet the EIA/TIA 568A-5 specification.
Category 6 Cable (CAT 6)
Cat 6 is a cable standard for Gigabit Ethernet and other interconnect
that is backward compatible with Category 5 cable, Cat-5e and Cat-3.
Cat-6 features more stringent specifications for crosstalk and system
noise. The cable standard is suitable for 10BASE-T/100BASE-TX and
1000BASE-T (Gigabit Ethernet) connections. It is suitable for 1000
Base-T (gigabit) Ethernet up to 100 M.
The cable contains four twisted copper wire pairs, just like earlier
copper cable standards. When used as a patch cable, Cat-6 is normally
terminated in RJ-45 electrical connectors. If components of the
various cable standards are intermixed, the performance of the signal
path will be limited to that of the lowest category.
Category 7 cable (CAT7)
Cat 7 (ISO/IEC 11801: 2002 category 7/class F), is a cable standard
for Ultra Fast Ethernet and other interconnect technologies that
can be made to be backwards compatible with traditional CAT5 and
CAT6 Ethernet cable. CAT7 features even more stringent specifications
for crosstalk and system noise than CAT6. To achieve this, shielding
has been added for individual wire pairs and the cable as a whole.
The CAT7 cable standard has been created to allow 10-Gigabit Ethernet
over 100M of copper cabling. The cable contains four twisted copper
wire pairs, just like the earlier standards. CAT7 can be terminated
in RJ-45 compatible GG45 electrical connectors which incorporate
the RJ-45 standard, and a new type of connection to enable a smoother
migration to the new standard. When combined with GG-45 connectors,
CAT7 cable is rated for transmission frequencies of up to 600 MHz.
Top 
EIA/TIA-568A and EIA/TIA-568B Pin Outs
EIA/TIA-568A and EIA/TIA-568B are closely related joint Electronic
Industries Alliance (EIA), Telecommunications Industry Association
(TIA), and International Telecommunications Union (ITU) standards
for twisted pair wiring. They define the pinout, or order of connections,
for wires in RJ-45 8-pin modular connector plugs and jacks used
with Category 3, Category 5 and Category 6, 4-pair cables.
Both TIA-568A and TIA-568B are used by many modern computer LAN
media on twisted pair cable, such as Ethernet 10BASE-T, 100BASE-TX
and 1000BASE-T. They are also used by many digital telephone PBX
systems.
The reason there are two conflicting standards is that the EIA/TIA
produced TIA-568A long after AT&T developed its own, different
convention known as 258A. By the time TIA-568A was published, AT&T
258A had become so widespread that it could not easily be discarded.
So the EIA/TIA blessed the AT&T 258A convention as TIA-568B.
Some advocate that TIA-568A be preferred to TIA-568B in new installations
because the mapping of pair numbers to telephone line numbers is
more consistent with TIA-568A. However, the TIA-568B (AT&T 258A)
convention is solidly entrenched and seems to show no signs of going
away.
Pairing and colours
The eight wires in the cable are grouped into four pairs. According
to telephony tradition dating from the days of manual switchboards,
one wire in each pair is the tip and the other is the ring. Each
wire pair is twisted within the cable to reduce crosstalk with the
other pairs. The pairs must be used as such; if a cable is incorrectly
wired to group wires from different pairs into a single pair, the
network will almost certainly malfunction. In telephony, hum, noise
and crosstalk may be present. This is known as a split pair error.
The cable pairs are assigned the first four entries in the AT&T
standard for colour codes in 25-pair and larger cables. The ring
wire is assigned the primary color with a stripe of the secondary
color, and the tip wire is assigned the secondary color with a stripe
of the primary color. In many cables, the tip wire lacks the secondary
color stripe; the solid primary color is used.
The primary color of pair 1 is blue, pair 2 is orange, pair 3 is
green and pair 4 is brown. The secondary color for all four pairs
is white. It is important to note that because these wire color
codes come from an old AT&T standard, they are the same for
all 8-pin termination standards, TIA-568A, TIA-568B, and USOC-8
(RJ-61). Only the specific assignments of pairs to connector pins
varies among these standards.
Wiring
Regardless of the wiring standard, RJ-45 modular jack pins are
numbered 1 through 8 as shown:

Figure 4: RJ45 Modular Jack Wiring
The assignments of wire pairs to plug and jack pins are as follows:
| RJ45 Wiring (EIA/TIA568A/B) |
| Pin |
568APair |
568B Pair |
Wire |
568A Colour |
568B Colour |
| 1 |
3 |
2 |
tip |
white/green stripe |
white/orange stripe |
| 2 |
3 |
2 |
ring |
green/white stripe |
orange/white stripe |
| 3 |
2 |
3 |
tip |
white/orange stripe |
white/green stripe |
| 4 |
1 |
1 |
ring |
blue/white stripe |
blue/white stripe |
| 5 |
1 |
1 |
tip |
white/blue stripe |
white/blue stripe |
| 6 |
2 |
3 |
ring |
orange/white stripe |
green/white stripe |
| 7 |
4 |
4 |
tip |
white/brown stripe |
white/brown stripe |
| 8 |
4 |
4 |
ring |
brown/white stripe |
brown/white stripe |
Figure 5: Assignment of Wire Pairs
Note that the only difference between TIA-568A and TIA-568B is
that pairs 2 & 3 (orange and green) are swapped. Both standards
wire the pins straight through, i.e., pins 1 through
8 on one end are connected to pins 1 through 8 on the other end.
Also, the same sets of pins are paired in both standards: pins 1&2
form a pair, as do 3&6, 4&5 and 7&8. Since electricity
doesnt care about wire insulation color, only about pin connections
and pairings, cables wired to either standard are interchangeable.
In other words, the choice between TIA-568A and TIA-568B is arbitrary
as long as both ends of each cable follow the same standard (except
for crossover cables, see below). Different cables may follow different
standards.
So if your wiring consists entirely of connectorised cables (i.e.,
cables that terminate directly in a RJ-45 jack or plug), especially
if you buy pre-connectorised cables, then you dont really
need to choose a standard.
But if you make a lot of cables yourself, and especially if you
have punch-block cross-connects or patch panels, then it becomes
important to pick one standard and make it the local site convention
to avoid confusion. Both standards are widespread, and neither shows
signs of going away although there seems to be a trend to TIA-568A
in new equipment and construction.
Top 
Crossover wiring
10BASE-T and 100BASE-TX use one pair for transmission in each direction.
The Tx+ line from each device connects to the tip conductor and
the Tx- line is connected to the ring. This requires that the transmit
pair of each device be connected to the receive pair of the device
on the other end. When a terminal device is connected to a switch
or hub, this crossover is done internally in the latter. A standard
straight through cable is used for this purpose where each pin of
the connector on one end is connected to the corresponding pin on
the other connector. Because the connector pin pairings are the
same in TIA-568A and TIA-568B, any given cable may be wired to either
standard and it will work; the choice between TIA-568A and TIA-568B
is arbitrary.
One terminal device may be connected directly to another without
the use of a switch or hub, but in that case the crossover must
be done externally in the cable. Since 10BASE-T and 100BASE-TX use
pairs 2 and 3, these two pairs must be swapped in the cable. This
is a crossover cable. A crossover cable must also be used to connect
two internally crossed devices (e.g., two hubs or switches) as the
internal crossovers cancel each other out.
Because the only difference between TIA-568A and TIA-568B are that
pairs 2 and 3 are swapped, a crossover cable is just a cable with
one connector following TIA-568A and the other TIA-568B.
Many newer Ethernet NICs, switches and hubs automatically apply
an internal crossover when necessary. This feature is known by various
vendor-specific terms, e.g., Netgear calls it Auto uplink
and other common vendor terms include Auto-MDI/MDI-X, Universal
Cable Recognition and Auto Sensing. This eliminates the need for
crossover cables, obsoletes the uplink/normal ports and manual selector
switches found on many older hubs and switches, and vastly reduces
installation errors, especially by non-technical users.
Crossover cables are never necessary in 1000BASE-T (Gigabit)as
all four pairs are used bidirectionally. All 1000BASE-T connections
should be made with straight-through cables using Category 5e cable
or better that provides all four pairs.
Backwards compatibility
Because pair 1 connects to the center pins (4&5) of the RJ-45
jack in both TIA-568A and TIA-568B, both standards are compatible
with the first line of RJ-11, RJ-14 RJ-25 and RJ-61 connectors that
all have the first pair in the center pins of these connectors.
If the second line of a RJ-14, RJ-25 or RJ-61 plug is used, it
connects to pair 2 (orange/white) of jacks wired to TIA-568A but
to pair 3 (green/white) in jacks wired to TIA-568B. This makes TIA-568B
potentially confusing in telephone applications.
Because of different pin pairings, the RJ-25 and RJ-61 plugs cannot
pick up lines 3 or 4 from either TIA-568A or TIA-568B without splitting
pairs. This would most likely result in unacceptable levels of hum,
crosstalk and noise.
Because 10BASE-T and 100BASE-TX use only pairs 2 and 3, pairs 1
and 4 need not even be present in the cable. It is also common in
some networks to use one 4-pair Category 5 cable to provide two
separate 10BASE-T or 100BASE-TX links, assigning only two pairs
to each link. However, such jacks cannot be used with 1000BASE-T
as it requires all four pairs for each link. They are also incompatible
with direct use by single-line telephones with standard RJ-11 plugs
as nothing is connected to pair 1 in the jack. However, a separate
telephone line could be connected to pair 1, thus allowing a single
jack to be used for either voice or Ethernet without reconfiguration.
Top 
Power over Ethernet
Power over Ethernet or PoE technology describes any system to transmit
electrical power, along with data, to remote devices over standard
twisted-pair cable in an Ethernet network. This technology is useful
for powering IP telephones, wireless LAN access points, webcams,
hubs, computers, and other appliances where it would be inconvenient
or infeasible to supply power separately. The technology is somewhat
comparable to POTS telephones, which also receive power and data
(although analog) through the same cable. It works with an unmodified
Ethernet cabling infrastructure.
Power over Ethernet is standardized in IEEE 802.3af. There are
several earlier, techniques, but the IEEE standard will probably
become dominant.
IEEE 802.3af provides 48 volts DC over two pairs of a four-pair
cable at a maximum current of 350 mA for a maximum load power of
16.8 watts. A phantom technique is used so that the
powered pairs may also carry data. This permits its use not only
with 10BASE-T and 100BASE-TX, which use only two of the four pairs
in the cable, but also with 1000BASE-T (Gigabit Ethernet), which
uses all four pairs for data transmission. This is possible because
all versions of Ethernet over twisted pair cable specify differential
data transmission over each pair with transformer coupling; the
DC supply and load connections can be made to the transformer centre-taps
at each end. Each pair thus operates in common mode
as one side of the DC supply, so two pairs are required to complete
the circuit. The polarity of the DC supply is unspecified; the powered
device must operate with either polarity with the use of a bridge
rectifier.
As of May 2005 there is discussion about increasing the amount
of power available on the cable. This may be done by sending power
through all four pairs of wire which would double the amount of
power. Other discussions include increasing the amount of current.
Before applying power, an IEEE 802.3af power source first probes
the remote device to determine if it can accept power, and if so,
which pairs should be used to supply it. Two modes, A and B, are
available. In mode A, pins 1&2 (pair #2 in TIA-568B wiring)
form one side of the 48VDC supply, and pins 3&6 (pair #3 in
TIA-568B) provide the 48VDC return. These are the same two pairs
used for data transmission in 10BASE-T and 100BASE-TX, allowing
the provision of both power and data over only two pairs in such
networks.
In mode B, pins 4&5 (pair #1 in both TIA-568A and TIA-568B)
form one side of the DC supply and pins 7&8 (pair 4 in TIA-568A
and TIA-568B) provide the return; these are the spare
pairs in 10BASE-T and 100BASE-TX. Mode B therefore requires a 4-pair
cable.
A load may choose either mode A or B, but not both. It does so
by connecting a nominal 25 kilo-ohm resistor between the desired
pair of pairs. The supply detects this resistor and applies power
in the selected mode. If the supply detects either an open or a
short circuit, no power is applied, thus protecting devices that
do not support IEEE 802.3af.
Top 
Fibre Optic Cabling
Fibre optic cable is made up of one or more continous strands of
glass. Each is surrounded by cladding and then re-inforcing material
to protect the fibre, and the whole cable is clad in sheath.
Rather than using electrical pulses, light is uses to transmit
information, which is read at the receiving end and converted into
electrical pulses for th eprocessing device.
The advantages of fibre optic cable are that it can carry much
higher quantities of data and it is immune to normal interference,
making errors negligible. Similarly, the signals do not attentuate
or weaken to any great degree and much longer distances can be run
before signals need to be regenerated. Fibre also offers the advantage
of security as it is almos impossible to tap in to it without being
detected. The cable is light in weight and small in size for the
capacity it can handle.
Its principle disadvantage is its cost. Due to the quality of glass
necessary and its fagility the cost of production is high. Termination
of fibre cables is a skilled task requiring care, and so installation
costs will also be higher. However while it is unlikely to compete
directly with coax and twisted pair as demand and and use of optical
fibre increases the cost will undoubtedly drop.
Types of Fibre
Multi-Mode Fibre
Multi-mode fibre is a type of optical fibre mostly used for shorter
distances, e.g. on campus. It can carry 100 Mbit/s for typical campus
distances; the actual maximum speed (given the right electronics)
depends upon the actual distance. It is easier to connect to than
single-mode optical fibre, but its limit on speed x distance is
lower. Multi-mode fibre has a larger centre core than single-mode
fibre.
The earliest fibre optic cables used a technique termed multi-mode
transmission. This is where the light signals from the laser are
broken up into a number of paths along the length of the fibre and
is reflected off the fibre wall. The amount of reflection, which
occurs, dictates the quality of the signal.
Multi-mode optical fibre is less expensive than Single-mode optical
fibre. Current transmission speeds and distances are 100Mb/s up
to 10km and 1Gb/s for distances up to 1km. Multi-mode optical fibre
has two categories. They are Step Index and Graded Index.
Single Mode Fibre
A single-mode optical fibre is an optical fibre in which only the
lowest order bound mode can propagate at the wavelength of interest.
Single mode fibres are best at retaining the fidelity of each light
pulse over longer distances and exhibit no dispersion caused by
multiple modes; thus more information can be transmitted per unit
time giving single mode fibres a higher bandwidth in comparison
with multi-mode fibres. A typical single mode optical fibre has
a core radius of 5-10 micrometers and a cladding radius of 120 micrometers.
Currently, data rates of up to 1 Gigabits/second are possible at
distances of 60 km and over 6 Gigabits/second at distances of up
to 10km. Typically single mode fibre is used within the Wide Area
Network rather than the Local Area Network.
Top 
Structured Wiring
Structured wiring has come to encompass many differet ideas but
at best can be descried as a wiring system designed in a logical
hierachy that accommodate all current data cabling and future requirements
in a single system.
Structured wiring is a concept which regards the communications
wiring of a building as an asset rather than a task to be undertaken
when equipment is installed. In a similar way to telephone wiring,
which is installed when a building is being furbished, data wiring
should be installed at the outset and designed with the intention
of obtaining a typical capital life-span of seven to ten years.
Wiring requirements change as equipment capabilities improve or
the organisation reorganises its office or technology requirements.
Structured wiring is able to accommodate these changes with very
little disruption and without the cost of rewiring the building.
Also, as the wiring becomes more and more important to the businesss
operation, the management, control and fault detection within that
wiring needs to be more sophisticated.
A simple way of achieving structured wiring may be to install a
backbone network between the floors of a building. Ideally this
should be fibre due to potential voltage difference between the
electricity supply on the floors.
Each floor may then have twisted pair cable to connect the different
desks, printers and servers to a central point on that floor, or
to a local device if the floor is very large.
Originally devices were connected to Hubs, but these days its very
difficult to find hubs, as Ethernet switches provide far better
functionality (prevent collisions, allow speed mis-matching, provide
security etc.) and are now less expensive than hubs.
Typically a large organisation may use a chassis based Ethernet
switch for the backbone and then stackable or Edge devices as they
get closer to the workgroups. Each network connection is then made
by connecting the appropriate cable in the wiring closet for that
floor. When people move, the most that will need to be done is to
run a new cable from the desk to the wiring closet or to the nearest
edge or workgroup switch. Figure 6 below provides a typical example
of structured wiring.

Figure 6: Example of Structured Wiring
The above plan, although simplified, shows the principle of structured
wiring. When people move only the wiring between the desk and the
local access point should need to be changed and when a new computer
is introduced to the organisation it simply needs to be connected
to its local network. To gain access all the users need to do is
to obtain the correct authorisation for the computer, regardless
of which network they are connected to.
Typically, a system of flood wiring is employed, so that cables
will be in place already whenever a device is added or moved. All
that is required is an adjustment to the patch panel in the local
wiring closet.
Top 
Wireless LAN
Introduction
When this book was first published Local Area Networks used Thick
cable to communicate, and within the space of 15 years, have gone
from Thick Coax (10 Base 5) to thin coaxial (10 Base 2) to twisted
pair (10 base T) cable, and now to wireless as a means of providing
an infrastructure.
A Wireless LAN or WLAN is a wireless local area network that uses
radio waves as its carrier: the last link with the users is wireless,
to give a network connection to all users in the surrounding area.
Areas may range from a single room to an entire campus. The backbone
network usually uses cables, with one or more wireless access points
connecting the wireless users to the wired network. Having said
this, there are also point to point wireless systems which are used
to build single links,although strictly speaking these systems tend
to use Microwave or Infrared.
WLAN is expected to continue to be an important form of connection
in many business areas. The market is expected to grow as the benefits
of WLAN are recognized. So far WLANs have been installed in universities,
airports, and other major public places. Decreasing costs of WLAN
equipment has also brought it to many homes. However, in the UK
the exorbitant cost of using such connections in public has so far
limited use to airports Business Class lounges, etc. Large
future markets are estimated to be in health care, corporate offices
and the downtown area of major cities. New York City has even begun
a pilot program to cover all five boroughs of the city with wireless
Internet. BTs Openzone is one such example of a public Wireless
LAN.
Originally WLAN hardware was so expensive that it was only used
as an alternative to cabled LAN in places where cabling was difficult
or impossible. Such places could be old protected buildings or classrooms,
although the restricted range of the 802.11b (typically 30ft.) limits
its use to smaller buildings. WLAN components are now cheap enough
to be used in the home, with many being set-up so that one PC (a
parents PC, for example) can be used to share an Internet
connection with the whole family (whilst retaining access control
at the parents PC).
Top 
802.11
802.11 legacy
The original version of the standard IEEE 802.11 released in 1997
specifies two raw data rates of 1 and 2 megabits per second (Mbit/s)
to be transmitted via infrared (IR) signals or in the Industrial
Scientific Medical frequency band at 2.4 GHz. IR remains a part
of the standard but has no actual implementations.
The original standard also defines Carrier Sense Multiple Access
with Collision Avoidance (CSMA/CA) as the media access method. A
significant percentage of the available raw channel capacity is
sacrificed (via the CSMA/CA mechanisms) in order to improve the
reliability of data transmissions under diverse and adverse environmental
conditions.
At least five different, somewhat-interoperable, commercial products
appeared using the original specification, from companies like Alvarion
(PRO.11 and BreezeAccess-II), Netwave Technologies (AirSurfer Plus
and AirSurfer Pro) and Proxim (OpenAir). A weakness of this original
specification was that it offered so many choices that interoperability
was sometimes challenging to realise. It is really more of a "meta-specification"
than a rigid specification, allowing individual product vendors
the flexibility to differentiate their products. Legacy 802.11 was
rapidly supplemented (and popularized) by 802.11b.
802.11b
The 802.11b amendment to the original standard was ratified in
1999. 802.11b has a maximum raw data rate of 11 Mbit/s and uses
the same CSMA/CA media access method defined in the original standard.
Due to the CSMA/CA protocol overhead, in practice the maximum 802.11b
throughput that an application can achieve is about 5.9 Mbit/s over
TCP and 7.1 Mbit/s over UDP.
802.11b products appeared on the market very quickly, since 802.11b
is a direct extension of the DSSS modulation technique defined in
the original standard. Hence, chipsets and products were easily
upgraded to support the 802.11b enhancements. The dramatic increase
in throughput of 802.11b (compared to the original standard) along
with substantial price reductions led to the rapid acceptance of
802.11b as the definitive wireless LAN technology.
802.11b is usually used in a point-to-multipoint configuration,
wherein an access point communicates via an omni-directional antenna
with one or more clients that are located in a coverage area around
the access point. With high-gain external antennas, the protocol
can also be used in fixed point-to-point arrangements, typically
at ranges up to eight kilometers (km) although some report success
at ranges up to 80120 km where line of sight can be established.
This is usually done in place of costly leased lines or very cumbersome
microwave communications equipment.
802.11b cards can operate at 11 Mbit/s, but will scale back to
5.5, then 2, then 1 Mbit/s, if signal quality becomes an issue.
Since the lower data rates use less complex and more redundant methods
of encoding the data, they are less susceptible to corruption due
to interference and signal attenuation. Extensions have been made
to the 802.11b protocol (e.g., channel bonding and burst transmission
techniques) in order to increase speed to 22, 33, and 44 Mbit/s,
but the extensions are proprietary and have not been endorsed by
the IEEE. Many companies call enhanced versions "802.11b+".
These extensions have been largely obviated by the development of
802.11g, which has data rates up to 54 Mbit/s and is backwards-compatible
with 802.11b.
802.11a
The 802.11a amendment to the original standard was ratified in
1999. The 802.11a standard uses the same core protocol as the original
standard, with a maximum raw data rate of 54 Mbit/s, which yields
realistic achievable throughput in the mid-20 Mbit/s. The data rate
is reduced to 48, 36, 24, 18, 12, 9 then 6 Mbit/s if required. 802.11a
has 12 non-overlapping channels, 8 dedicated to indoor and 4 to
point to point. It is not interoperable with 802.11b, except if
using equipment that implements both standards.
Since the 2.4 GHz band is heavily used, using the 5 GHz band gives
802.11a the advantage of less interference. However, this high carrier
frequency also brings disadvantages. It restricts the use of 802.11a
to almost line of sight, necessitating the use of more access points;
it also means that 802.11a cannot penetrate as far as 802.11b since
it is absorbed more readily, other things (such as power) being
equal.
802.11g
In June 2003, a third modulation standard was ratified: 802.11g.
This flavour works in the 2.4 GHz band (like 802.11b) but operates
at a maximum raw data rate of 54 Mbit/s, or about 24.7 Mbit/s net
throughput like 802.11a. It is fully backwards compatible with b
and uses the same frequencies. Details of making b and
g work well together occupied much of the lingering
technical process. In older networks, however, the presence of an
802.11b participant significantly reduces the speed of an 802.11g
network.
The 802.11g standard swept the consumer world of early adopters
starting in January 2003, well before ratification. The corporate
users held back and Cisco and other big equipment makers waited
until ratification. By summer 2003, announcements were flourishing.
Most of the dual-band 802.11a/b products became dual-band/tri-mode,
supporting a, b, and g in a
single mobile adaptor card or access point.
While 802.11g held the promise of higher throughput, actual results
were mitigated by a number of factors: conflict with 802.11b-only
devices, exposure to the same interference sources as 802.11b, limited
channelization (only 3 fully non-overlapping channels like 802.11b)
and the fact that the higher data rates of 802.11g are often more
susceptible to interference than 802.11b, causing the 802.11g device
to reduce the data rate to effectively the same rates used by 802.11b.
The move to dual-mode/tri-mode products also carries with it economies
of scale (e.g. single chip manufacturing). The use of dual-band/tri-mode
products ensures the best possible throughput in any given environment.
A new proprietary feature called Super G is now integrated in certain
access points. These can boost network speeds up to 108 Mbit/s by
using channel bonding. This feature may interfere with other networks
and may not support all b and g client cards. In addition, packet
bursting techniques are also available in some chipsets and products
which will also considerably increase speeds. Again, they may not
be compatible with some equipment.
802.11n
In January 2004 IEEE announced that it had formed a new 802.11
Task Group (TGn) to develop a new amendment to the 802.11 standard
for local-area wireless networks. The real data throughput will
be at least 100 Mbit/s (which may require an even higher raw data
rate at the physical layer), and should be up to 45 times
faster than 802.11a or 802.11g, and perhaps 20 times faster than
802.11b. It is projected that 802.11n will also offer a better operating
distance than current networks.
There are two competing proposals of the 802.11n standard, expected
to be ratified: WWiSE (World-Wide Spectrum Efficiency), backed by
companies including Broadcom, and TGn Sync backed by Intel and Philips.
TGnSync and WWiSE are holding discussions to determine how the proposals
may be merged. The standardization process is expected to be completed
by the end of 2006.
802.11n builds upon previous 802.11 standards by adding MIMO (multiple-input
multiple-output).
Top 
MIMO
MIMO stands for multiple-input multiple-output, an abstract mathematical
model for some systems. In radio communications if multiple antennas
are employed, the MIMO model naturally arises. MIMO exploits phenomena
such as multipath propagation to increase throughput, or reduce
bit error rates, rather than attempting to eliminate effects of
multipath.
MIMO can also be used in conjunction with OFDM and it will be part
of the IEEE 802.11n High-Throughput standard, which is expected
to be finalized in early 2007.
MIMO and information theory
It has been shown that the channel capacity (a theoretical measure
of throughput) for a MIMO system is increased as the number of antennas
are increased, proportional to the minimum of number of transmit
and receive antennas. This basic result in information theory is
what lead to a spur of research in this area.
Benefits of MIMO
MIMO will offer up to eight times the coverage, and up to six times
the speed, of current 802.11g networks. Most manufacturers have
released "pre-n" hardware in anticipation of the eventual
standard.
Wireless LAN In PCs
The use of Windows XP as the standard in home PCs makes
it very easy to setup a PC as a Wireless LAN basestation
and (using XP built in Internet Connection Sharing mode) allows
all the PCs in the home to access the Internet via the base
PC. However, lack of expertise in setting up such systems often
means that someone nearby, such as a next-door neighbour, may also
share the Internet connection. This is typically without the wireless
network owners knowledge; it may even be without the knowledge
of the user (the neighbour) if the users computer automatically
selects a wireless network.
The future of wireless networks
The 802.11n (MIMO) standard is still being discussed, but one prototype
can offer up to (under optimal conditions) 250 Mbit/second. This
is over four times the speed of existing 802.11g hardware.
Other new enhancements will include the arrival of 802.11e and
802.11i. 802.11e will prioritize important information on the network
(i.e. a voice message takes precedence over email or a webpage).
802.11i will give an increase in security by using WPA2.
Top 
|